HR | Employment Law | Health & Safety

01244 893776


Antuzis v DJ Houghton Catching Services Ltd

» Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

One of the main benefits of trading as a limited company as opposed to a sole trader is that you can take advantage of the concept of “limited liability” – in other words, your personal assets will not be at risk if you are sued. There are notable exceptions to this well-established rule, as shown in the recent case of Antuzis v DJ Houghton Catching Services Ltd.


The company provided staff who would be transported to work at various farms to catch chickens which were then sent off for slaughter.

Not only was the work physically demanding and unpleasant, but the working conditions were also appalling. The claimants were forced to work long hours without adequate breaks or holidays, no accurate records of hours worked were kept, and anyone who spoke up was threatened by a sinister individual who was used as the company’s “enforcer”.The Claimants eventually brought various claims, including claims for unpaid wages, unlawful deductions from wages and holiday pay against not only the company officers (the director and company secretary) as individuals.

What happened?

The court had to consider a very technical point of law which was whether the company officers had knowingly induced the company to breach its statutory obligations to the employees. If they did not and were acting in good faith and within the scope of their authority, they would be entitled to be protected by the “shield” of the limited company. The court found that the evidence of the Director and Company Secretary was almost entirely fabricated and concluded that they must have known that what they were doing was illegal. The court found that the motive for this was to maximise the company’s profits and benefit themselves, even though the employees were forced to live and work in terrible conditions. The outcome was that the Director and Company Secretary were found to be personally liable, along with the Company, and will now have to pay substantial damages to the employees.

What do Employers need to know?

What this case demonstrates is that Directors and Company Secretaries can be personally liable if they knowingly disregard statutory rights. Commenting on the case, employment law specialistGwyn Edwards said “Thankfully it is rare to hear of such an appalling case where the employer completely disrespected its employees’ rights. Employers need to take notice of this case as although it may be tempting to cut corners to reduce staffing costs, the outcome can be disastrous”.

About The Author.

James Rowland

James Rowland

James is the Commercial Director at Neathouse Partners. He is responsible for all Account Management, Sales & Marketing within the company. Having gained a BSc in Psychology and further study for his post-grad Law degree, James embarked on his legal career in 2014. Since then, he has become an Associate Director at a national Employment Law boutique, studied for a Masters in Marketing, and as of 2018, been a Director at Neathouse Partners. Outside of the office, James is a keen cricketer, playing very badly (he calls himself a Batsman but averages single figures) in the Cheshire League for Nantwich CC. He also loves watching his childhood football team, Crewe Alexandra, and is an avid lover of cinema (his favourite film being Pulp Fiction). Feel free to connect with James on LinkedIn.


More Posts

Free resources

Employment Law & HR Manual For Business Owners & HR Managers