Contracts of employment are legally binding agreements between employers and employees. A contract of employment does not necessarily need to be written in order to be valid, but it is generally best practice if they are.
Like many other types of contract that parties may enter into contracts of employment are governed by contract law, which means there must be:
Employers and employees are bound by the terms and conditions of a contract until it comes to an end, or until the terms are changed.
Contracts of employment usually consist of both expressed and implied terms.
Those which are clearly stated in writing or verbally. Express terms are not limited to written employment contracts, but can also be included in other documents as well, such as the employee handbook. The terms must meet any statutory requirements, such as the right to daily rest breaks and paid holiday entitlements.
These are terms that are not necessarily written into the contract itself, but may be incorporated into contracts of employment because:
In order to comply with statutory requirements, as laid out in section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1993, an employer must provide a written statement of employment particulars if the employee is employed for one month or more.
The statement must detail the basic terms of employment, such as when the employee starting work, their salary and a brief job description.
An employee must receive a written statement of particulars within 2 months of starting work. A full contract of employment will still be necessary as the written particulars will not be as extensive as the contract of employment.
Either an employer or an employee can breach the terms and conditions of the contract. A breach occurs when either party does not adhere to their obligations under the contract.
If an employee feels you have breached your obligations as an employer under the contract of employment, then the employee in question may be entitled to claim compensation.
A comprehensive contract of employment will provide an employee with all the relevant terms and conditions that govern their relationship with their employer.
By including all relevant terms and conditions, an employee will know exactly what is expected of them. Section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 states that the Statement of Main Terms and Conditions should include:
While you will be legally compliant if your contracts contain the information above, you should also consider whether there are other things that you need to put into the Contract.
Not only to cover any specific requirements of your industry (for example, the requirement to have a valid DBS check) but also to protect your business if the employee leaves (for example, confidentiality and post-termination restrictions).
Written contracts provide both employers and employees with a certain level of protection.
A written contract will provide conclusive certainty as to what the terms and conditions of employment are. While a section 1 statement is compliant in law, a contract will go further and provide additional terms that a statutory statement cannot.
Many employers may want to add additional terms to the contracts, such as restrictive covenants or the need for an employee to have a DBS disclosure.
Importantly, an employee may also want a full written contract to provide them with peace of mind and security. It could also be that they have negotiated advantageous terms, and they want to ensure these terms are in the contract.
A well-drafted contract of employment means that both parties know where they stand to avoid disputes further on down the line.
If an employer fails to provide you with a section 1 statement or a contract of employment, then the employee can make an application to the Employment Tribunal who will then determine what the terms and conditions are, which can be very costly.
Contracts of employment do not need to signed to be valid.
A contract of employment can be a verbal agreement. Therefore no signature is required.
If you do only have a verbal contract of employment, as an employer, you will still need to provide employees with a written statement of employment particulars within 2 months of them starting work with you.
There is no statutory obligation which dictates that the written statement of particulars or the contract of employment must be signed – once an employee has accepted a job offer and they start work, there is a legally binding contract between employer and employee.
The fact that an employee has not signed a contract of employment will not automatically relieve an employer of their statutory obligations, nor can they deny that an employee of their statutory rights, such as the right to be paid annual leave.
Additionally, an unsigned contract does not mean that the employer can change the terms and conditions at will, depriving employees of certain rights afforded to them in the contract.
Likewise, an employee cannot refuse to carry out their duties under the contract of employment, under the premise that they have not signed their contract.
An unsigned contract will not be void, and its terms will still be enforceable.
If an employer issues a contract of employment, and the employee works under it, it will most likely be found that the contract has been accepted.
To prevent any complications arising further on down the line, employers should always follow up on any unsigned contracts as soon as possible.
It is best practice to ensure all contracts are signed and dated, as it makes the terms and conditions agreed between the parties clear.
Any contracts should always be kept for your records, and a copy should be supplied to the employee for their records as well.
It is inevitable that at some point during the employment relationship, either party will want to change the terms and conditions of the employment contract.
An employer may want to change contract terms due to a business restructure or for economic reasons. Terms that they may want to change may include rates of pay, place of work or hours of work.
An employee may want to change the contract as they may want to improve terms that are already in the contract, such as an increase in pay or more holiday days.
If as an employer, you wish to vary an employee’s contract of employment, you must first consult with the employee in question, to negotiate the terms and conditions to be changed, and obtain their consent. You may want to consider incentives to help employees agree to the changes.
Employees will be more likely to accept the changes if they fully understand the reasoning behind them, and they are given the opportunity to express their views. Problems can be easily avoided and issues resolved through good communication with the employee.
If the employee agrees to the changes, you should get their consent to the variations in writing, as well as giving them a written statement which details the changes that have been made.
If an agreement cannot be reached with the employees on the new terms and conditions, then as an employer, you can serve notice to terminate the existing contract and offer the employee to re-engage on the new terms. However, this should be treated as a last resort, once a full and proper consultation has taken place with the employee and their representative,
It is essential that you follow a fair dismissal process and give the employee the right to appeal against the decision.
It is important to note that if you decide to dismiss and re-engage 20 or more employees, you have a legal obligation to consult with any recognised trade unions or workforce representatives. Failure to do so could lead to all affected employees getting a protective award, which would give them a maximum of 90 days’ pay.
No. if you decide as an employer to impose new terms and conditions unilaterally, you will be in breach of contract, enabling your employees to seek remedies in the court.
Employees may be entitled to bring a claim for constructive dismissal and also unlawful deduction of wages in the employment tribunal if the changes affect their pay. They may also consider seeking damages for breach of contract in the civil court.
Not only will imposing the changes unilaterally expose you to the risk of claims, but it will also most likely affect employee engagement and morale, which may reduce overall productivity levels.